Read source passages and their interpretations here, or browse the full bibliography for additional works.
Hippolytus
Hippolytus’s early third-century commentary on Daniel, known in English through fragments translated in the Ante-Nicene Fathers. It reads the image and beasts of Daniel as successive empires and counts six thousand years from Adam to the end.
Text available here
Hippolytus: a bishop in Pontus foretells the judgment within a year →
Hippolytus: 500 years from Christ’s birth to the end · commentary →
Hippolytus: 500 years from Christ’s birth to the end · commentary →
Jerome
Jerome argues for a future resurrection and Antichrist interpretation of Daniel against Porphyry’s reading about Antiochus. He discusses a forty-five-day interval; Porphyry’s position survives here through his opponent’s account.
Bibliography entry · Read at the cited source
View cited source · ccel.org ↗Edition and location
Gleason L. Archer translation, Baker 1958; Roger Pearse transcription 2004
Chapter XII, verses 1–13; prologue and digital edition footer
Origen
Extends the raising of Christ's temple to the resurrection of his whole body, the Church.
Bibliography entry · Read at the cited source
Origen
Explains the net's separation at the consummation and why mixed congregations persist until the angels' judgment.
Bibliography entry · Read at the cited source
Victorinus of Pettau (attributed; recension requires study)
Identifies forty-two months with three and a half years and discusses the identities of two witnesses. Recensional lineage remains uncollated.
Text available here
Victorinus identifies the two witnesses · commentary →
View cited source · newadvent.org ↗Edition and location
Source. Translated by Robert Ernest Wallis. From Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 7. Edited by Alexander Roberts, James Donaldson, and A. Cleveland Coxe. (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886.) New Advent revised web edition.
Exposition of Revelation 11
Rufinus of Aquileia
Reads Daniel and gospel warnings together in interpreting final deception; creedal reception.
Bibliography entry · Read at the cited source
View cited source · newadvent.org ↗Edition and location
Source. Translated by W.H. Fremantle. From Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Vol. 3. Edited by Philip Schaff and Henry Wace. (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1892.) New Advent revised web edition.
Antichrist/Son of Perdition discussion and concluding resurrection exposition
Lange commentary contributors and English editors
Distinguishes Jerusalem's tribulation from a later period culminating in the cosmic catastrophe and Christ's advent.
Bibliography entry · Read at the cited source
View cited source · biblehub.com ↗Edition and location
Bible Hub English transcription of Commentary on the Holy Scriptures; exact printed witness requires collation.
Third Cycle: Matthew 24:29, with discussion of verses 21-22
Isaac Abarbanel
Treats Zechariah 12–14 as one prophecy; interprets pierced mourning through a fallen Israelite commander and challenges Christian identification. Places uncompleted restoration after the exile rather than in the Second Temple period.
Bibliography entry · Read at the cited source
View cited source · sefaria.org ↗Edition and location
Sefaria Community Translation; API versionSource Sefaria; individual translator unidentified
Zechariah 12:1, introductory paragraphs 1–9
Moses Maimonides
Separates messianic political restoration from ultimate world-to-come, reads ready-made bread imagery figuratively, predicts Messiah's death and descendants, and forbids fixing dates. Requires Davidic/Solomonic dynasty and rejects Torah abrogation.
Text available here
The messianic kingdom and the world to come · commentary →
View cited source · en.wikisource.org ↗Edition and location
J. Abelson1906, Maimonides on the Jewish Creed, Wikisource transcription based on Holtzer1901 Judeo-Arabic/Hebrew edition
Introduction to Sanhedrin10, critique of five popular opinions, days of Messiah discussion, principles9 and12–13
Abdu'l-Baha; provisional translation and commentary by Moojan Momen
Retains an outward Byzantine-Persian prediction while offering multiple spiritual senses involving revelation, divine law and resurrection.
Text available here
Abdu’l-Bahá on the many meanings of Qur’an 30 · commentary →
The Arabic witnesses · commentary →
Outward history and meanings within meanings · commentary →
View cited source · momen.org ↗Edition and location
Moojan Momen, Lights of Irfan 2 (2001), pp. 99–117, author-hosted HTML
Makatib Abdu'l-Baha I, pp. 62–102; translation opening through numbered interpretations 1–9 (to p. 85); Momen introduction
John Calvin; English translation John Owen
John Calvin interprets the prophetic books of Zechariah and Malachi. In the selected commentary on Malachi 4:5, he identifies John the Baptist as the promised Elijah and explains their shared role in restoring religious worship.
Text available here
Calvin identifies John the Baptist as the promised Elijah · commentary →
View cited source · ccel.org ↗Edition and location
John Calvin; John Owen translation, Calvin Translation Society (1849), commentary on Malachi4:5. CCEL transcription. Three consecutive paragraphs beginning But Christ himself through transferred to him; reference-link formatting removed.
Commentary on Malachi4:5; selected three paragraphs
James Gray
Distinguishes the Church's removal, Israel's renewed witness, and a judgment of living nations from the last judgment.
Bibliography entry · Read at the cited source
View cited source · biblehub.com ↗Edition and location
Bible Hub English transcription of Concise Bible Commentary; exact printed witness requires collation.
Things to Come, on Matthew 24-25
Dositheos of Jerusalem and synodal signatories
Distinguishes an incomplete intermediate state from bodily resurrection and completed judgment. Describes release of some repentant departed through prayer before the common resurrection, with the time unknown.
Text available here
Who signed the Jerusalem confession? · commentary →
Related doctrine: Synod of Jerusalem on resurrection · commentary →
View cited source · maksimologija.org ↗Edition and location
English web transcription with numerous visible typographical errors; translator and print lineage unconfirmed
Decree 18 and closing subscriptions
D. H. Makobe
Records a 1920 end expectation and visions of judgment, while interpreting the confrontation through defiance of law and deception. Provides an account to evaluate against Edgar’s competing history.
Bibliography entry · Read at the cited source
Nduku-Fessau Badze; Religioscope interviewer
A Kimbanguist theologian distinguishes the founder’s reported self-understanding as Christ’s servant from later expectations of his living return, while recounting succession traditions.
Bibliography entry · Read at the cited source
Nicholas of Cusa
Nicholas of Cusa’s short Latin treatise on the last days, printed in the Paris edition of his works (1514). It reads the years of Christ’s life as jubilees of the Church and places the Church’s resurrection after 1700 and before 1734.
Text available here
Nicholas of Cusa: the Church’s resurrection between 1700 and 1734 →
View cited source · archive.org ↗Edition and location
Nicholas of Cusa, Coniectura de novissimis diebus, in Haec accurata recognitio trium voluminum operum clariss. P. Nicolai Cusae card. (Paris: in aedibus Ascensianis [Josse Bade], 1514), the leaves headed “Coniectura.” and “De novissimis diebus. Fo. II.” (Internet Archive ARes38417, Biblioteca de la Universidad de Sevilla copy, leaves n161–n162), from “Hoc solum absque temerario iudicio” to “omnibus ignotus.” Abbreviations expanded (absq; absque, ꝙ quod, ī in, Christian⁹ Christianus, macrons for m and n); u/v and i/j usage, æ and ę, capitals, virgules (/) and punctuation as printed; spacing normalized. Transcribed from the Internet Archive page images.
Leaves headed “Coniectura.” and “De novissimis diebus. Fo. II.”
Marc Tabani
Documents competing John Frum return interpretations, the year-2000 flood expectation, and local Islamic restoration perspectives. Shows why affiliation and interpretation must be attached to particular communities.
Bibliography entry · Read at the cited source
Angela Puca
Discusses renewal and ecological futures alongside modern reception of Ragnarök.
Bibliography entry · Read at the cited source
Tosafist commentary collection
The commentary contrasts Balaam’s distant salvation language with Moses’ encouragement and identifies the Moab passage with David.
Bibliography entry · Read at the cited source
Manushchihr i Goshnajaman per source; E.W.West translator
Explains uninterrupted human presence at resurrection, seven renovation agents and57-year raising of dead.
Text available here
Manushchihr on preparing the renewal · commentary →
Manushchihr on those alive at the resurrection · commentary →
Manushchihr explains resurrection and the world to come · commentary →
Daesoon Jinrihoe
Contemporary institutional explanation of reordering, cultivation, plague and Later-World opening.
Bibliography entry · Read at the cited source
Daesoon Jinrihoe
Institution explicitly rejects fixed prophetic dates and a terminal apocalypse while describing cyclical Later World renewal and immortality.
Bibliography entry · Read at the cited source
Scholarship
Hugh Beattie
Hugh Beattie traces interpretations of the Dajjal across Islamic traditions, including spiritual and political identifications and modern conspiracy narratives.
Bibliography entry · Read at the cited source
View cited source · cdamm.org ↗Edition and location
Critical Dictionary of Apocalyptic and Millenarian Movements, English online edition
Introduction, Origins and Early History, Some Later Developments, Modern and Contemporary Approaches
Hamid Algar
Surveys contradictory locations and characteristics and differing assignments of the deceiver's defeat; does not homogenize Sunni and Shia transmission.
Bibliography entry · Read at the cited source
View cited source · iranicaonline.org ↗Edition and location
Encyclopaedia Iranica online article, displayed author and publication/update dates
Opening through comparison of Jesus and Mahdi as destroyer of Dajjal